'We called ourselves the lifeboat crew': The way fired aid employees initiated a rescue initiative 'to save as many infants as we can'.

These individuals describe themselves as the "emergency rescue team". After losing their jobs when international support was slashed earlier this year, a team of committed staff decided to create their own emergency initiative.

Refusing to "wallow in misery", Rob Rosenbaum, along with equally dedicated ex-colleagues, initiated efforts to rescue some of the essential projects that faced closure after the reductions.

Now, close to 80 programmes have been preserved by a connector platform operated by the leader and additional ex- team members, which has secured them in excess of $110 million in new funding. The group behind the Pro initiative projects it will assist 40 million people, encompassing many infants and toddlers.

Following the office shutdown, spending was frozen, numerous staff lost their jobs, and international programmes either came to a shuddering halt or were struggling toward what the economist calls "final deadlines".

He and a few co-workers were approached by a foundation that "sought to understand how they could make the best use of their constrained funds".

They built a menu from the ended initiatives, identifying those "offering the most critical assistance per dollar" and where a alternative supporter could realistically intervene and maintain operations.

They quickly realised the requirement was broader than that original foundation and commenced to reach out to further funding sources.

"We referred to ourselves as the rescue team at the beginning," states the economist. "The organization has been failing, and there are insufficient lifeboats for all initiatives to get on, and so we're trying to literally protect as many young children as we can, get as many on to these lifeboats as possible, via the projects that are providing support."

The initiative, now working as part of a international policy center, has garnered backing for 79 projects on its selection in in excess of 30 nations. Three have had initial backing restored. Nine were not able to be saved in time.

Funding has come from a blend of non-profit entities and affluent donors. The majority prefer to stay unnamed.

"They stem from very different motivations and viewpoints, but the shared sentiment that we've received from them is, 'I am shocked by what's unfolding. I really want to find a method to step in,'" explains the economist.

"In my view that there was an 'aha moment' for all of us as we commenced efforts on this, that this provided an chance to transition from the passive sadness, remaining in the misery of everything that was occurring around us, to having something productive to fully engage with."

A specific initiative that has found backing through Pro is work by the Alliance for International Medical Action to deliver care such as care for malnourished children, maternity services and vital childhood vaccines in the country.

It is vital to continue these initiatives, explains the leader, not only because reinitiating work if they stopped would be hugely expensive but also because of how much reliance would be lost in the war-torn regions if the organization withdrew.

"Alima shared […] 'we're very worried that if we walk away, we may be unable to return.'"

Projects with longer-term goals, such as bolstering healthcare networks, or in different sectors such as schooling, have been excluded from Pro's work. It also does not seek to maintain initiatives permanently but to "provide a buffer for the organizations and, frankly, the wider community, to figure out a longer-term solution".

Now that they have obtained funding for all projects on its initial list, the initiative announces it will now concentrate on assisting more people with "tested, efficient solutions".

Kimberly Adams
Kimberly Adams

Financial analyst with over a decade of experience in global markets and economic forecasting.